Abstract
AbstractThe Mediterranean Basin is a global biodiversity hotspot, but formal conservation approaches have not been wholly effective to halt species and ecosystem losses in this world region. There is wide agreement that maintaining traditional and diverse land-use systems is key to conserving biodiversity across the Mediterranean region. Biocultural approaches provide a perspective to understand and manage the interplay of nature and culture in various contexts. To develop biocultural systems as positive alternatives to unsustainable land-use systems requires an understanding of the decision-making contexts that enable such approaches. The aim of this synthesis study is therefore to compare how four biocultural conservation systems in the Mediterranean are shaped by values, rules, and knowledge. Our study is based on a synthesis of the literature published on agdal (Morocco), communal forests (Spain), sacred natural sites (Greece), and hima (Lebanon). Our synthesis shows that instrumental, intrinsic, and relational values are all fundamental components of the systems studied. Instrumental values, such as the provision of fodder or firewood, are central, and are often the result of a careful adaptation to the uncertainty inherent to Mediterranean climatic conditions. Systems like agdal and hima have originally been shaped by informal rules (often with the primary motivation to ensure equitable resource use and frequently involving taboos) and were then formalized to varying degrees. All four systems are strongly driven by local knowledge. We conclude that biocultural systems in the Mediterranean represent “people and nature” approaches that support linkages between nature and human well-being. Fostering biocultural conservation in the Mediterranean requires navigating multiple interlinkages between values, rules, and knowledge in decision-making.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference69 articles.
1. Arias-Arévalo P, Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E (2017) Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 22(4):43
2. Armitage D, Mbatha P, Muhl E-K, Rice W, Sowman M (2020) Governance principles for community-centered conservation in the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Conserv Sci Pract 2(2):e160
3. Auclair L, Baudot P, Genin D, Romagny B, Simenel R (2011) Patrimony for resilience: evidence from the forest agdal in the Moroccan High Atlas mountains. Ecol Soc 16(4):24
4. Auclair L, Alifriqui M (2012) Agdal: Patrimoine Socio-écologique de l'Atlas Marocain. IRD-IRCAM, Rabat, Marseille
5. Avtzis DN, Stara K, Sgardeli V et al (2018) Quantifying the conservation value of sacred natural sites. Biol Cons 222:95–103
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献