Abstract
AbstractAgroforestry systems (AFS) upscaling has the potential to integrate sustainability and resilience objectives into agriculture. However, this is a daunting task requiring multi-actor collaboration across public and private sectors at multiple governance levels, coupled with innovative approaches to jointly managing AFS knowledge. Understanding such multi-actor interactions from a network perspective may help to unravel how social structures, created by relational patterns enhance or hinder AFS upscaling. Our paper aims to comparatively explore the role of regional actor-networks on AFS upscaling for a selected farming system. By conducting semi-structured interviews, we collected information about the ties of 86 actors supporting cacao agroforestry systems (CAFS) across two regions of Colombia. We use social network analysis (SNA) to comparatively visualize and understand the general structure of these networks, find relational patterns between the diverse categories of actors involved, and identify a set of key players bridging the majority of the actors within these networks. We find highly centralized networks that connect multiple actors by a low number of mostly non-reciprocal ties. Within these networks, we identify a predominance of bridging ties over bonding ties, homophily patterns among research and education institutions, and heterophily configurations among farmer-based organizations. We also find that the composition of the sets of key actors and the platforms where they converge varies substantially from region to region due to decentralized agricultural policies and differing characteristics across regions. Our approach provides key entry points for promoting multi-actor coalitions that can effectively expand the benefits of AFS in tropical agricultural systems.
Funder
Internationale Klimaschutzinitiative
Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF) e.V.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference82 articles.
1. Abbott P, Benjamin T, Burniske G, et al (2018) An analysis of the supply chain of cacao in Colombia. Cali
2. ADR, FAO (2019) Plan Integral de Desarrollo Agropecuario y Rural con Enfoque Territorial Departamento del Cesar. Bogotá D.C.
3. Agronet (2021) Evaluaciones Agropecuarias—EVA y Anuario Estadístico del Sector Agropecuario. https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=59
4. Akamani K, Holzmueller EJ (2017) Socioeconomic and policy considerations in the adoption of agroforestry systems: an ecosystem-based adaptive governance approach. In: Dagar JC, Tewari VP (eds) Agroforestry: anecdotal to modern science. Springer Sinagpore, Singapore, pp 833–855
5. Andreotti F, Speelman EN, Van den Meersche K, Allinne C (2020) Combining participatory games and backcasting to support collective scenario evaluation: an action research approach for sustainable agroforestry landscape management. Sustain Sci 15:1383–1399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00829-3
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献