Abstract
AbstractThe urgent need to address the sustainability issues of the Anthropocene requires a dialogue capable of bridging different knowledge systems, values, and interests. This dialogue is considered one of the most crucial challenges in collaborative research approaches. With this research, we seek to break with monologues in collaborative research by offering a decolonising methodological approach that combines the notion of dialogue of wisdom, communication theories and ethical principles of Andean philosophy. The methodological framework, the circle of dialogue of wisdom, is the result of an iterative action–reflection process developed in a North–South collaborative research project for territorial planning in Bolivia. Our praxis confirms the potentials offered by a listening-based dialogue for (i) dealing with knowledge–power relations in collaborative research projects, (ii) promoting mutual learning and knowledge co-creation between different knowledge systems, (iii) re-valuating local and Indigenous knowledge, and (iv) decolonising the society–science–policy dialogue.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health(social science),Global and Planetary Change
Reference57 articles.
1. Abson DJ et al (2016) Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio 46(1):30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
2. AGRUCO (2011) Agroecologia y desarrollo endogeno sustentable para vivir bien: 25 años de la experiencias de Agruco. Cochabamba. http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Bolivia/agruco/20170928052016/pdf_223.pdf
3. Andreotti V et al (2015) Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization Indigeneity Educ Soc 4(1):21–40
4. Antequera N (2016) Debemos gobernarnos a nosotros mismos. Organizacion politica originaria del ayllu andino (Kirkyawi-Bolivia). Tiquipaya: Tupac Katari
5. Archila M (2017) Cómo entender el diálogo de saberes. LASAFORUM 48(2):61–62
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献