Threatened sustainability: extractivist tendencies in the forest-based bioeconomy in Finland

Author:

Holz Jana R.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractBioeconomy is portrayed by the EU and several national governments as a central element contributing to sustainability strategies and a post-fossil transformation. This paper critically engages with extractivist patterns and tendencies in the forest sector as one of the main bio-based sectors. It argues that despite the official endorsement of circularity and renewability in the forest-based bioeconomy, current developments of modern bioeconomy might threaten sustainability prospects. The Finnish forest-based bioeconomy and one of its well-known showcase projects, the bioproduct mill (BPM) in the municipality of Äänekoski, serve as a case study in this paper. The forest-based bioeconomy in Finland is scrutinized as a potential continuation or consolidation of extractivist patterns, rather than an alternative to these tendencies. The lens of extractivism is applied to identify possible extractivist and unsustainable characteristics of the case study which are discussed along the following dimensions: (A) degree of export orientation and processing, (B) the scale, scope, and speed of extraction, (C) socio-economic and environmental impacts, and (D) subjective relations to nature. The extractivist lens provides analytical value to scrutinizing practices, principles, and dynamics of the contested political field and vision of bioeconomy in the Finnish forest sector. The analysis results in a discussion of latent and manifest social, political, and ecological contradictions within the forest-based bioeconomy in Finland. Based on its analytical lens and the empirical case of the BPM in Äänekoski, it can be concluded that extractivist patterns and tendencies are perpetuated within the Finnish forest-based bioeconomy.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Sociology and Political Science,Ecology,Geography, Planning and Development,Health (social science),Global and Planetary Change

Reference117 articles.

1. Acosta A (2013) Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse. In: Lang M, Mokrani D (eds) Beyond Development. Alternative Visions from Latin America. Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation, Amsterdam/Quito, pp 61–86

2. Albrecht M (2019) (Re-)producing bioassemblages: positionalities of regional bioeconomy development in Finland. Local Environ 24:342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2019.1567482

3. Albrecht M, Kortelainen J (2020) Recoding of an industrial town: bioeconomy hype as a cure from decline? Eur Plan Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1804532

4. Almeida DV (2020) Extractivism. One of the most expansionist global enterprises—squashing any other ways of living with the land. Uneven Earth. Where the ecological meets the political. http://unevenearth.org/2020/08/extractivism/. Accessed 30 Jan 2023

5. Anlauf A (2022) An extractive bioeconomy? Phosphate mining, fertilizer commodity chains, and alternative technologies. Sustain Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01234-8

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3