1. Artigue, M., Grugeon, B., Assude, T., & Lenfant, A. (2001). Teaching and learning algebra: Approaching complexity trough complementary perspectives. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. Proceedings of 12th ICMI Study Conference, The university of Melbourne, Australia, December 9–14, 2001 (pp. 21–32). Department of Science and Mathematics Education, University of Melbourne. https://archive.org/details/proceedingsof12t0002unse/page/n3/mode/2up
2. Bednarz, N., Kieran, C., & Lee, L. (1996). Approaches to algebra. Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1732-3_1
3. Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2005). La praxéologie comme unité d’analyse des processus didactiques [Praxeology as a unit for analyzing didactic processes]. In A. Mercier & C. Margolinas (Eds.), Balises pour la didactique : Cours de la 12ème école d’été de didactique des mathématiques (pp. 107–122). La pensée sauvage.
4. Bosch, M., Gascón, J., & Trigueros, M. (2017). Dialogue between theories interpreted as research praxeologies: The case of APOS and the ATD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9734-3
5. Bressoux, P. (2012). L’influence des pratiques enseignantes sur les acquisitions scolaires des élèves. [The influence of teaching practices on students’ learning achievement]. Regards Croisés Sur L’économie, 12, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.3917/rce.012.0208