An Innovative Non-destructive Technology for Controlling the Storage Period of Chicken Eggs Using Egg Parameters
-
Published:2023-12-19
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1935-5130
-
Container-title:Food and Bioprocess Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Food Bioprocess Technol
Author:
Narushin Valeriy G.ORCID, Romanov Michael N.ORCID, Salamon AttilaORCID, Kent John P.ORCID
Abstract
AbstractWe proposed here a non-destructive technology for pre-sorting eggs into subclasses characterized by a specifical acceptable shelf life and quality requirements. Egg characteristics were identified suiting a predictive model for controlling storage periods. Accordingly, the relationships of egg parameters were assessed, with weight loss (ΔW) during storage being the best indicator of changes in egg contents variables. Using changes in ΔW, we established three indicators with the maximum effect on fast egg drying and shrinkage. These included egg weight (W), egg volume-to-surface area ratio, and air cell diameter. The relationship formulae were derived to estimate the ΔW value accurately. This approach enables to judge regarding the potential of each particular egg subclass for its acceptable weight shrinkage and assign an optimal storage period for it. The proposed non-invasive analytical method can be implemented in industrial conditions for both table and hatching eggs with the available set of automated technological equipment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Process Chemistry and Technology,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Food Science
Reference75 articles.
1. Abdel-Nour, N., Ngadi, M., Prasher, S., & Karimi, Y. (2011). Prediction of egg freshness and albumen quality using visible/near infrared spectroscopy. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4, 731–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-009-0265-0 2. Aboonajmi, M., Akram, A., Nishizu, T., Kondo, N., Setarehdan, S. K., & Rajabipour, A. (2010). An ultrasound based technique for the determination of poultry egg quality. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 56(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2009-rae 3. Aboonajmi, M., Setarehdan, S. K., Akram, A., Nishizu, T., & Kondo, N. (2014). Prediction of poultry egg freshness using ultrasound. International Journal of Food Properties, 17(9), 1889–1899. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2013.770015 4. Aboonajmi, M., Saberi, A., Abbasian Najafabadi, T., & Kondo, N. (2015). Quality assessment of poultry egg based on Vis-NIR spectroscopy and RBF networks. International Journal of Food Properties, 19(December), 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2015.1075215 5. Al-Hajo, N. N. A., Oleiwi, W. S., Hadel, S. N., Ahmed, A.-R. S., & Safaa, H. F. (2010). The effect of coating and storage time on internal quality of quail eggs in room temperature 2- shellac. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(4), 1-e–6-e.
|
|