Experimental Assessment of Emission Factors from Fires in the Built Environment Including Scaling Effects
-
Published:2023-06-27
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0015-2684
-
Container-title:Fire Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Fire Technol
Author:
Åström JoakimORCID, McNamee Margaret, Truchot Benjamin, Marlair Guy, van Hees Patrick
Abstract
AbstractConcern for the health of the natural environment is growing as human population grows. Recently, renewed attention has been given to the environmental impact of fires and the fire implications of sustainability choices made in the built environment. To properly understand the environmental impact of fires, however, it is crucial that we can estimate fire emissions. This paper explores the concept of fire emissions and emission factors and investigates the potential to use small scale testing to develop emission factors for fire emissions. The findings show that there is a potential to use dynamic tests such as the cone calorimeter (CC, ISO 5660) and fire propagation apparatus (FPA, ISO 12136) to develop emission factors to estimate larger scale fire emissions, at least for CO and CO2 emissions. While there is a spread of data from between the CC or FPA and the medium scale tests, this is of the same order or less than the spread between the two small scale tests. The spread in emission factor values from the various tests is smaller for CO2 than for CO and greatest for small CO-emission factors (< 10 g/kg). More work is needed to similarly characterise a broad range of species.
Funder
Fire Protection Research Foundation Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement Lund University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,General Materials Science,Building and Construction
Reference77 articles.
1. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit Cynthia A, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03180-140232 2. Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science (New York, NY). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855 3. McNamee M, Meacham B, van Hees P, Bisby L, Chow WK, Coppalle A, Dobashi R, Dlugogorski B, Fahy R, Fleischmann C, Floyd J, Galea ER, Gollner M, Hakkarainen T, Hamins A, Hu L, Johnson P, Karlsson B, Merci B, Ohmiya Y, Rein G, Trouvé A, Wang Y, Weckman B (2019) IAFSS agenda 2030 for a fire safe world. Fire Saf J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102889 4. Green E, Hope T, Yates A (2015) Sustainable infrastructure: sustainable buildings. ICE Publishing, London, p 150. https://doi.org/10.1680/sisb.58064 5. Wieczorek C, Ditch B, Bill R (2011) Environmental impact of automatic fire sprinklers: part 2. Experimental study. Fire Technol 47(3):765–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-010-0192-7
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|