Author:
Kottwitz Maria Undine,Wehrt Wilken,Gerhardt Christin,Augusto Coelho Diana,Schmutz Damian,Elfering Achim
Abstract
AbstractCognitive failures are errors in routine action regulation that increase with higher mental demands. In particular, in occupations where guidance such as teaching or supervision is essential, cognitive failures harm one’s performance and also negatively impact knowledge transfer. The aim of this study is to investigate yesterday’s work–home conflict (WHC) and objectively assessed sleep-onset latency as antecedents of a next-day increase in cognitive failures. Fifty-three teachers were assessed during a working week, in the morning, after work, and in the evening on each working day, as well as on Saturday morning. Sleep-onset latency was assessed with ambulatory actimetry. The multi-level analyses showed both WHC and sleep-onset latency predict cognitive failures the next working day (controlling for cognitive failures from the previous day, sleep quantity, and leisure time rumination until falling asleep). However, there was no association between yesterday’s WHCs and the nightly sleep-onset latency. Thus, nightly sleep-onset latency did not mediate the effects of yesterday’s WHCs on today’s cognitive failures. Our results highlight the importance of sleep and a good work–life balance for daily cognitive functioning. In order to promote the cognitive functioning of employees as well as occupational safety, good working conditions and recovery should both be considered.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Psychology,Applied Psychology,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference93 articles.
1. Allen, T. D., & Kiburz, K. M. (2012). Trait mindfulness and work–family balance among working parents: The mediating effects of vitality and sleep quality. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.002
2. Allen, T. D., & Martin, A. (2017). The work–family interface: A retrospective look at 20 years of research in JOHP. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22, 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000065
3. Amstad, F. T., & Semmer, N. K. (2009). Recovery and the work-privacy interface. In P. L. Perrewé, D. C. Ganster, & S. Sonnentag (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and wellbeing (vol. 7: Current perspectives on job-stress recovery, pp. 125–166). Emerald Group Publishing.
4. Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022170
5. Amstad, F., Demerouti, E., & Semmer, N. K. (2016). Sharing work events with the family: An interview study among dual-earner parents. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 224, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000236
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献