How Do Teachers Collaborate in Informal Professional Learning Activities? An Epistemic Network Analysis
-
Published:2024-05-24
Issue:5
Volume:33
Page:796-810
-
ISSN:1059-0145
-
Container-title:Journal of Science Education and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Sci Educ Technol
Author:
Fütterer TimORCID, Omarchevska YoanaORCID, Rosenberg Joshua M.ORCID, Fischer ChristianORCID
Abstract
AbstractTeachers turn to many sources for support and professional learning, including social media-based communities that have shown promise to help teachers access resources and facilitate productive exchanges. Although such online communities show promise, questions about their quality for providing a suitable learning environment remain insufficiently answered. In this study, we examine how teachers’ engagement on Twitter (now known as “X”) may adhere to characteristics of high-quality professional development (PD) activities. In that, we employ advanced conversational analysis techniques that extend the primarily descriptive methods used in prior research. Specifically, we collected data from three Twitter communities related to Advanced Placement Biology (N = 2,040 tweets, N = 93 teachers). Qualitative two-cycle content analyses derived both tweet content and sentiment. Using epistemic network analyses, we examined the collaborative structures to examine how participation patterns can identify characteristics of high-quality online PD. Results indicate that some teachers use Twitter with a content focus and coherent to their individual contexts and prior knowledge. Notably, differences in collaboration and participation patterns by teachers’ overall activity level hint at the existence of an online community of practice. More active teachers communicated more about how their individual contexts relate to instruction, whereas less active teachers exhibited more targeted engagement, for instance, related to sharing teaching resources and organizing learning opportunities. Overall, this study illustrates how Twitter may provide a meaningful learning environment to teachers so that it can serve as a relevant avenue for their professional learning.
Funder
Projekt Deal Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference81 articles.
1. Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Beier, M. E. (2013). Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 911–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032338 2. Aguilar, S. J., Rosenberg, J. M., Greenhalgh, S. P., Fütterer, T., Lishinski, A., & Fischer, C. (2021). A different experience in a different moment? Teachers’ social media use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211063898 3. Akoglu, K., Lee, H., & Kellogg, S. (2019). Participating in a MOOC and professional learning team: How a blended approach to professional development makes a difference. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 129–163. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/195234/ 4. Borchers, C., Rosenberg, J. M., Gibbons, B., Burchfield, M. A., & Fischer, C. (2021). To scale or not to scale: Comparing popular sentiment analysis dictionaries on educational Twitter data. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM). International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM), Paris, France. 5. Borko, H., Jacobs, J. K., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 548–556). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0
|
|