Was sagt die LAC-Depressionsstudie nun wirklich aus?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Was sagt die LAC-Depressionsstudie nun wirklich aus?

Published:2019-12-04 Issue:1 Volume:65 Page:27-31
ISSN:0935-6185
Container-title:Psychotherapeut
language:de
Short-container-title:Psychotherapeut

Author:

Hautzinger Martin,Leuzinger-Bohleber Marianne,Fiedler Georg,Bahrke Ulrich,Kallenbach-Kaminski Lisa,Kaufhold Johannes,Ernst Mareike,Negele Alexa,Schoett Margarete,Küchenhoff Helmut,Günther Felix,Rüger Bernhard,Beutel Manfred

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Clinical Psychology

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00278-019-00388-8.pdf

Reference6 articles.

1. Beutel ME, Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Rüger B, Bahrke U, Negele A, Haselbacher A, Fiedler G, Keller W, Hautzinger M (2012) Psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavior therapy of chronic depression: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-117

2. Cuijpers P, Huibers M, Furukawa T (2010) The need for research on treatment of chronic depression. JAMA Psychiatry 74:242–243

3. Fonagy P, Rost F, Carlyle JA et al (2015) Pragmatic randomized controlled trial of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy for treatment-resistant depression. The Tavistock adult depression study. World Psychiatry 14:312–321

4. Kaiser T, Kolar D, Kok RN, Schuster R (2019) Was sagt die LAC-Depressionsstudie wirklich aus? Eine methodenkritische Betrachtung

5. Leuzinger-Bohleber M, Hautzinger M, Fiedler G, Keller W, Bahrke U, Kallenbach L, Kaufhold J, Ernst M, Negele A, Schoett M, Küchenhoff H, Günther F, Rüber B, Beutel M (2019a) Outcome of psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioural long-term therapy with chronically depressed patients: a controlled trial with preferential and randomized allocation. Can J Psychiatry 64:47–58