Follow-up after bariatric surgery: is it time to tailor it? Analysis of early predictive factors of 3-year weight loss predictors of unsuccess in bariatric patients

Author:

Voglino Costantino,Badalucco SimonaORCID,Tirone Andrea,Ciuoli Cristina,Cantara Silvia,Benenati Nicoletta,Bufano Annalisa,Formichi Caterina,Croce Federica,Gaggelli Ilaria,Vuolo Maria Laura,Vuolo Giuseppe

Abstract

AbstractBariatric surgery (BS) is the most effective treatment strategy for obesity. Nevertheless, a subset of patients does not reach a successful weight loss or experience long-term weight regain. Conflicting evidence exists regarding predictors of BS outcomes. We aimed to define the early factors linked to 3 year unsuccessful weight loss in order to promote a tailored close follow-up. We enrolled 443 patients who underwent BS from January 2014 to December 2018 with a 3 year follow-up. An unsuccessful BS outcome was defined as a percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) < 20. We compared the characteristics between successful and unsuccessful patients in order to identify predictor factors of unsuccess after surgery. We found that the proportion of patients with unsuccessful weight loss progressively increased from one to three years after BS. In a multiple regression model, only 1 month %TWL and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were significantly associated with 3 year unsuccessful weight loss. We stratified our cohort in four groups according to the risk of BS unsuccess, in terms of 1 month %TWL and type of surgery (SG vs gastric bypass). Interestingly, groups showed a significant difference in terms of %TWL at each follow-up point. Patients submitted to SG with lower 1 month %TWL must be considered at higher risk of future weight regain; consequently, they require a tailored and closer follow-up. Graphical abstract

Funder

Università degli Studi di Siena

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Surgery

Reference41 articles.

1. World Health Organization: The top 10 causes of death. Available from: Accessed 10 June 2021 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and overweight

2. Tan SYT, Tham KW, Ganguly S, Tan HC, Xin X, Lew HYF, Lim CH, Tan J, Chong KY, Lee PC (2021) The impact of bariatric surgery compared to medical therapy on health-related quality of life in subjects with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Obes Surg 31(2):829–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05038-6 (Epub 2020 Oct 15 PMID: 33063154)

3. Voglino C, Tirone A, Ciuoli C, Benenati N, Paolini B, Croce F, Gaggelli I, Vuolo ML, Cuomo R, Grimaldi L, Vuolo G (2020) Cardiovascular benefits and lipid profile changes 5 years after bariatric surgery: a comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-y gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg 24(12):2722–2729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04482-9 (Epub 2019 Dec 16 PMID: 31845146)

4. Gloy VL, Briel M, Bhatt DL, Kashyap SR, Schauer PR, Mingrone G, Bucher HC, Nordmann AJ (2013) Bariatric surgery versus non-surgical treatment for obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 22(347):f5934. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f5934.PMID:24149519;PMCID:PMC3806364

5. Voglino C, Tirone A, Ciuoli C, Benenati N, Bufano A, Croce F, Gaggelli I, Vuolo ML, Badalucco S, Berardi G, Cuomo R, Castagna MG, Vuolo G (2021) Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score and micronutrient deficiency in bariatric patients: midterm outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one anastomosis gastric bypass/mini gastric bypass. Obes Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05486-8 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34031850)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3