Laparoscopic splenectomy as a definitive management option for high-grade traumatic splenic injury when non operative management is not feasible or failed: a 5-year experience from a level one trauma center with minimally invasive surgery expertise
-
Published:2021-04-10
Issue:4
Volume:73
Page:1515-1531
-
ISSN:2038-131X
-
Container-title:Updates in Surgery
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Updates Surg
Author:
Birindelli Arianna, Martin Matthew, Khan Mansoor, Gallo Gaetano, Segalini Edoardo, Gori Alice, Yetasook Amy, Podda Mauro, Giuliani Antonio, Tugnoli Gregorio, Lim Robert, Cripps Michael, Gavriilidis Paschalis, Affinita Antonio, Coniglio Carlo, Catena Fausto, Tarasconi Antonio, De Simone Belinda, De’ Angelis Nicola, Ansaloni Luca, Tartaglia Dario, Coccolini Federico, Chiarugi Massimo, Agresta Ferdinando, Baiocchi Gianluca, Sganga Gabriele, Di Carlo Isidoro, Pata Francesco, Ribeiro Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle, Lima Daniel Souza, Fraga Gustavo Pereira, Pereira Bruno Monteiro, Millo Paolo, Sartelli Massimo, Tonini Valeria, Cervellera Maurizio, Sileri Pierpaolo, Del Vecchio Giovanni, Marini Pierluigi, Di Saverio SalomoneORCID,
Abstract
AbstractTechnique, indications and outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy in stable trauma patients have not been well described yet. All hemodynamically non-compromised abdominal trauma patients who underwent splenectomy from 1/2013 to 12/2017 at our Level 1 trauma center were included. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed with per-protocol and an intention-to-treat comparison between open vs laparoscopic groups. 49 splenectomies were performed (16 laparoscopic, 33 open). Among the laparoscopic group, 81% were successfully completed laparoscopically. Laparoscopy was associated with a higher incidence of concomitant surgical procedures (p 0.016), longer operative times, but a significantly faster return of bowel function and oral diet without reoperations. No significant differences were demonstrated in morbidity, mortality, length of stay, or long-term complications, although laparoscopic had lower surgical site infection (0 vs 21%).The isolated splenic injury sub-analysis included 25 splenectomies,76% (19) open and 24% (6) laparoscopic and confirmed reduction in post-operative morbidity (40 vs 57%), blood transfusion (0 vs 48%), ICU admission (20 vs 57%) and overall LOS (7 vs 9 days) in the laparoscopic group. Laparoscopic splenectomy is a safe and effective technique for hemodynamically stable patients with splenic trauma and may represent an advantageous alternative to open splenectomy in terms of post-operative recovery and morbidity.
Funder
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Schroeppel TJ, Croce MA (2007) Diagnosis and management of blunt abdominal solid organ injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 13(4):399–404 2. Pachter HL, Guth AA, Hofstetter SR, Spencer FC (1998) Changing patterns in the management of splenic trauma: the impact of nonoperative management. Ann Surg 227(5):708–717 3. Haan JM, Bochicchio GV, Kramer N, Scalea TM (2005) Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury: a 5-year experience. J Trauma 58(3):492–498 4. Dolejs SC, Savage SA, Hartwell JL, Zarzaur BL (2018) Overall splenectomy rates stable despite increasing usage of angiography in the management of high-grade blunt splenic injury. Ann Surg 268(1):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA 5. Di Saverio S, Moore EE, Tugnoli G, Naidoo N, Ansaloni L, Bonilauri S, Cucchi M, Catena F (2012) Non operative management of liver and spleen traumatic injuries: a giant with clay feet. World J Emerg Surg 7(1):3
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|