Understanding Evil Deeds in Human Terms: Empathy for the Perpetrators, the Dead Victims, and the Ethics of Being the Afterlife

Author:

Elgabsi NatanORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis essay concerns what it means to historicize evil in an ethically responsible way: that is, what it means to think and narrate perpetrators and victims of evil through what is testified to and told about them. I show that a responsible gaze can only be recognized by allowing ourselves to be addressed by the dead victims. The argument consists in an existential critique of a set of common ideas in the human sciences, which suggest that we must attempt to empathize with the perpetrators in order to understand their deeds in human terms. This empathetic thought, I suggest, easily leads us either to aestheticize the victims or to think that the evils in our history should be addressed as a metaphysical susceptibility to evil internal to being human. By critically discussing these ideas, I show that empathy for the perpetrators in several respects does injustice to the dead victims, which marks that we as their afterlife continue to have an irresponsible relationship with the dead.

Funder

Victoriastiftelsen

Abo Akademi University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

Reference64 articles.

1. Agamben, Giorgio. 2008. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: Zone Books.

2. Ahlskog, Jonas. 2016. Michael Oakeshott and Hayden White on the Practical and the Historical Past. Rethinking History 20: 374–94.

3. Ahlskog, Jonas. 2020. The Primacy of Method in Historical Research: Philosophy of History and the Perspective of Meaning. London: Routledge.

4. Arendt, Hannah. 1994a. A Reply to Eric Voegelin. In Essays in Understanding 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, ed. Jerome Kohn, 401–8. New York: Schocken Books.

5. Arendt, Hannah. 1994b. Understanding and Politics (The Difficulties of Understanding). In Essays in Understanding 1930-1954: Formation, Exile, and Totalitarianism, ed. Jerome Kohn, 307–27. New York: Schocken Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3