Author:
Wündisch Joachim,Bittner Rüdiger,Johnson Wendy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Appelbaum, Paul S. 2005. Behavioral genetics and the punishment of crime. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) 56 (1): 25–27.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.56.1.25
.
2. Appelbaum, Paul S. 2014. The double helix takes the witness stand: behavioral and neuropsychiatric genetics in court. Neuron 82 (5): 946–949.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.026
.
3. Appelbaum, Paul S., and Nicholas Scurich. 2014. Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior. The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 42 (1): 91–100.
4. Appelbaum, Paul S., Nicholas Scurich, and Raymond Raad. 2015. Effects of Behavioral Genetic Evidence on Perceptions of Criminal Responsibility and Appropriate Punishment. Psychology, public policy, and law: an official law review of the University of Arizona College of Law and the University of Miami School of Law 21 (2): 134–144.
https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000039
.
5. Lisa G. Aspinwall; Teneille R. Brown; James Tabery. (2012b). Supplementary Materials for: The Double-Edged Sword: Does Biomechanism Increase or Decrease Judges’ Sentencing of Psychopaths?
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/suppl/2012/08/15/337.6096.846.DC1/1219569.Aspinwall.SM.pdf
.