Intimacy, Anonymity, and “Care with Nothing in the Way” on an Abortion Hotline

Author:

Karlin JenniferORCID,Hodge Caroline C.

Abstract

AbstractThis essay is an ethnographic account of a volunteer, anonymous hotline of physicians and advanced practice providers who offer medical advice and guidance to those who are taking medications on their own to end their pregnancies. Attending to the phenomenology of caring on the Hotline reveals a new form of medical expertise at play, which we call “care with nothing in the way.” By operating outside the State’s scrutiny of abortion provision, the Hotline offers its volunteers a way to practice abortion care that aligns with their professional and political commitments and that distances them from the direct harm they see caused by the political, financial, and bureaucratic constraints of their clinical work. By delineating the structure of this new regime of care, these providers call into question the notion of the “good doctor.” They radically re-frame widely shared assumptions about the tenets of the ideal patient–doctor relationship and engender a new form of intimacy–one based, ironically, out of anonymity and not the familiarity that is often idealized in the caregiving relationship. We suggest the implications of “care with nothing in the way” are urgent, not only in the context of increasing hostility to abortion rights, but also for a culture of medicine plagued by physician burnout.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,General Medicine,Health (social science)

Reference121 articles.

1. Adams, Vincanne 2013 Markets of Sorrow, Labors of Faith: New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina Durham: Duke University Press

2. Andaya, Elise, and Joanna Mishtal 2016 The Erosion of Rights to Abortion Care in the United States: A Call for a Renewed Anthropological Engagement with the Politics of Abortion. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 31(1): 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12298

3. Annapragada, Akshaya. 2017. A Dangerous TRAP: How Restricting Abortion Harms Women. Harvard Political Review. 6 February 2017. Accessed 18 April 2022. https://harvardpolitics.com/dangerous-trap-restricting-abortion/.

4. Backe, Emma 2018 A Crisis of Care: The Politics and Therapeutics of a Rape Crisis Hotline. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 32(4): 463–480

5. Baker, Claire 2022 “Dr. April Lockley Answers Your Questions About Abortion Pills: ‘To Protect Each Other As Much As We Can.’” Ms. Magazine. 16 March 2022. Accessed 15 April 2022. https://msmagazine.com/2022/03/16/april-lockley-online-medication-abortion-pills-miscarriage-hotline/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3