Could the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview Hold Therapeutic Potential? Suggestions for Further Exploration and Adaptation Within a Framework of Therapeutic Assessment

Author:

Strand MattiasORCID,Bäärnhielm Sofie

Abstract

AbstractThe Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), included in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, is a person-centered instrument for systematically appraising the impact of cultural factors in psychiatric assessment. A number of key areas in the future development of the CFI have been identified in order to ensure further clinical uptake. In this paper, we suggest that applying a Therapeutic Assessment (TA) approach in using the CFI—i.e., framing the interview in a way that gives primacy to its self-transformative potential by explicitly focusing on those issues that are seen as the most urgent, relevant, and meaningful by the patient—could prove helpful in alleviating patients’ suffering beyond what is achieved by merely collecting relevant cultural information that may inform diagnosis and subsequent treatment interventions. The TA methodology has been designed as a collaborative approach to psychological assessment in which the assessment procedure itself is meant to induce therapeutic change. This is achieved by explicitly focusing on the particular questions and queries that patients have about themselves with respect to their mental health problems or psychosocial well-being; these questions are then allowed to guide the assessment process and the interpretation of the findings. We suggest a number of potential modifications to the related Outline for Cultural Formulation and to the CFI content that could strengthen a TA-inspired focus. With this paper, we do not claim to offer a definitive integration of the TA approach in using the CFI but hope to further the discussion of a therapeutic potential of the instrument.

Funder

Karolinska Institute

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,General Medicine,Health (social science)

Reference66 articles.

1. Aggarwal, N.K. 2013 Cultural Psychiatry, Medical Anthropology, and the DSM-5 Field Trials. Medical Anthropology 32: 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2013.776047

2. Aggarwal, N.K., R. Desilva, A.V. Nicasio, M. Boiler, and R. Lewis-Fernández 2015Does the Cultural Formulation Interview for the Fifth Revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) Affect Medical Communication? A Qualitative Exploratory Study from the New York Site. Ethnicity & Health 20: 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2013.857762

3. Aggarwal, N.K., A. Glass, A. Tirado, M. Boiler, A. Nicasio, M. Alegría, M. WAll, and R. Lewis-Fernández 2014 The Development of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview-Fidelity Instrument (CFI-FI): A Pilot Study. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 25(3): 1397–1417. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2014.0132

4. Aggarwal, N.K., P. Lam, E.G. Castillo, M.G. Weiss, E. Diaz, R.D. Alarcón, R. H. Van Dijk, D.M. Rohlof, M. Ndetei, R. Scalco, and R. Lewis-Fernández 2016 How Do Clinicians Prefer Cultural Competence Training? Findings from the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview Field Trial. Academic Psychiatry 40(4):584–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0429-3

5. Aggarwal, N.K., A.V. Nicasio, R. DeSilva, M. Boiler, and R. Lewis-Fernández 2013 Barriers to Implementing the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview: A Qualitative Study. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 37(3): 505–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-013-9325-z

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3