Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Africa: exclusion of students with disabilities in South African higher education

Author:

Ndlovu Sibonokuhle

Abstract

Abstract   While contemporary scholarship seeks to include Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) into epistemology, to re-centre knowledge that has been placed in the periphery, in Africa largely and in South Africa specifically, construction of African Indigenous Knowledge (AIK) has shaped disability in negative ways, hence the exclusion of persons with disabilities in society. The article utilised a review of literature as a methodology to explore the ways in which negative AIK has been constructed, to frame disability negatively and to exclude students with disabilities in South African higher education. Decolonial theory informed the imperceptible underlying cause of negative AIK about disability. Ubuntu was viewed as an African philosophy that could bring back the being and humanness of those with disabilities. Incorporating African proverbs relating to tolerance of disability into the curriculum was proposed as the way in which positive AIK could be re-centred, to assist the inclusion of students with disabilities in families, communities and higher education. The article sought to contribute to the contemporary debate of placing IKS at the centre of epistemology in higher education. While a number of studies have focused on re-centering IKS in epistemology largely, few have looked at it from the perspective of re-centering the positive AIK, to include students with disabilities in higher education in the South African context.

Funder

National Foundation for Cancer Research

University of Johannesburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference81 articles.

1. Aaill-Jilek, L. M. (1965). Epilepsy in the Wapongo tribe in Tanganyika. Acta Pychiatrica Scandanavia, 14, 57–86.

2. Akena, F. A. (2012). Critical analysis of the production of western knowledge and its implications for indigenous knowledge and decolonisation. Journal of Black Studies, 43(6), 336–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934712440448

3. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2003). Disability: key concepts. Polity Press.

4. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2005). The social model of disability: Europe and the majority world. The Disability Press.

5. Barnes, C., & Mercer, G. (2010). Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. Polity Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3