Locating Australian school students in sites of curriculum making: a literature review

Author:

Cairns RebeccaORCID

Abstract

AbstractYoung people and children are central to conceptualisations of curriculum as a social process, especially in school-based settings. However, students have tended to be on the periphery of education policy development more broadly and curriculum reform more specifically. As a more inclusive approach to engaging students in curriculum consultation processes is beginning to be taken in Australia, it is timely to gauge the extent to which students are being actively engaged as curriculum actors and research participants across the Australian curricular landscape. This article draws on Priestley et al.’s (2021) sites of curriculum making model to frame a systematised literature review of a decade of Australian academic and grey literature for the purpose of identifying the sites and activities in which students are active and/or the focus of research. The review suggests there is a small body of research on curriculum negotiation within school-based nano and micro sites of curriculum making. However, an absence of academic research related to meso and macro curriculum making means we have a limited understanding of the dynamics of the activities, interactions, contestations and power relations that constitute curriculum making in these spaces in relation to students. This article considers some of the reasons for and implications of these trends, including how existing curriculum and student voice scholarship might inform future research. It argues that a better understanding of the possibilities and challenges of student-centred curriculum making activities could assist in moving beyond superficial “consultation” methods, especially during periods of significant curriculum renewal.

Funder

Deakin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference73 articles.

1. ABS. (2024). Schools. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/education/schools/latest-release

2. ACARA. (2021). Consultation reports. University of Queensland. Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://acara.edu.au/curriculum/curriculum-review

3. ACARA. (2023). The consultation process on the Australian Curriculum, endorsed in September 2015. Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://www.acara.edu.au/curriculum/history-of-the-australian-curriculum/consultation-process

4. ACT Government. (2018). The future of education consultation report. Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://www.education.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/1251980/Future-Of-Education-Consultation-Report-Web.pdf

5. ACT Government. (n.d.). How was the strategy developed? Retrieved February 8, 2024, from https://www.education.act.gov.au/our-priorities/future-of-education/how-was-the-strategy-developed

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3