Indigenous Knowledge Systems in South Africa and Australia: transforming doctoral education

Author:

Keane Moyra,Raciti Maria,van der Westhuizen Gert,Motala Shireen,Stanton Sue,Gilbey Kathryn,Manathunga CatherineORCID,Qi Jing,Msimango Sindi

Abstract

AbstractWhile there is a great deal of support for the integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS) into higher education, there is still a significant amount of work to be done to move beyond tokenism. Intensive dialogue and robust conceptual outlooks are required. In this paper, this international team of South African and Australian scholars engage in a transcultural and transdisciplinary dialogue in order to chart how discourses and debates about IKS are understood in the different historical and cultural contexts of South Africa and Australia. They combine the theoretical approaches of de Sousa Santos (2014; 2018a and b) about epistemic justice with the theories of Odora Hoppers (2021), Visvanathan (2009), and First Nations Australian scholars Williams, Bunda, Claxton, and McKinnon (2018) about an Indigenous knowledges global decolonisation praxis framework. This dialogue is deliberately jarring and polyvocal because of our desire to go beyond tokenism. The South African team have chosen to apply Bacchi’s (2009) approach of problem formulation and policy as change proposal to discourses about IKS in South African policy documents. The Australian First Nations team have demonstrated how Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander knowledge systems work through the power of stories. Purposely adopting a polyvocal, multimodal approach, the Australian section includes ethnographic policy analysis and narratives that illustrate how IKS might operate in higher education.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference55 articles.

1. ACOLA - Australian Council of Learned Academies (ACOLA). (2016). Review of Australia’s research training system. Melbourne: ACOLA

2. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: what’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.

3. Castle, J., Keane, M., & Wadee, A. A. (2021). Postgraduate supervision literature review. Unpublished.

4. Chakrabarty, D. (2007). Provincializing Europe (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

5. Cloete, N., Mouton, J., & Sheppard, C. J. (2015). Doctoral education in South Africa: Policy, discourse and data. African Minds.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3