Does the Goal Justify the Methods? Harm and Benefit in Neuroscience Research Using Animals-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Does the Goal Justify the Methods? Harm and Benefit in Neuroscience Research Using Animals

Published:2014 Issue: Volume: Page:47-78
ISSN:1866-3370
Container-title:Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Vieira de Castro Ana Catarina,Olsson I. Anna S.

Publisher

Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/7854_2014_319

Reference81 articles.

1. Abdi S, Haruo A, Bloomstone J (2004) Electroconvulsive therapy for neuropathic pain: a case report and literature review. Pain Physician 7:261–263

2. Allen C (2004) Animal pain. Noűs 38:617–643

3. American Psychiatric Association APA (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

4. APC (2003) Review of cost-benefit assessment in the use of animals in research. Report of the cost-benefit working group of the animal procedures committee. Home Office, Communication Directorate, London

5. Arluke A, Sanders CR (1996) Regarding animals. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Biotechnologies and Animals: The Impact of Genetic Engineering on Human-Animal Relationships;The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series;2022

2. Rodent and fly models in behavioral neuroscience: An evaluation of methodological advances, comparative research, and future perspectives;Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews;2021-01

3. Genomic, proteomic, and systems biology approaches in biomarker discovery for multiple sclerosis;Cellular Immunology;2020-12

4. Animal Use in Neurobiological Research;Neuroscience;2020-05

5. A Novel Prototype Device for Microencapsulation of Benznidazole: In Vitro/In Vivo Studies;AAPS PharmSciTech;2020-03-31