Abstract
AbstractIncreasingly visible climate change consequences challenge carbon-based economies worldwide. While expert knowledge on climate change percolates through political initiatives and public awareness, its translation into large-scale policy actions appears limited. Climate change consequences unequally target regions, countries and social classes, a vital issue for social cooperation. When facing an imminent ecological collapse, in which conditions can self-interested agents gain environmental awareness and settle on a sustainable path of actions when their knowledge of the imminent collapse is bounded? This cooperation emerges from the interaction between individuals and the interaction of various cognitive processes within individuals. This article develops an agent-based model for this emergence of cooperation enriched with the Agent Zero neurocognitive grounded cognitive architecture. We investigate when agents endowed with deliberative, affective and social modules can settle on actions that safeguard their environment through numerical simulations. Our results show that cooperation on sustainable actions is the strongest when the system is at the edge of collapse. Policy measures that increase the environment’s resilience become internalized by the agents and undermine awareness of the ecological catastrophe. Depending on the cognitive channels activated, agent behaviors and reactions to specific interventions significantly vary. Our analysis suggests that taking different cognitive channels, deliberative, affective, social, and others into account, significantly impact results. The complexity of agent cognition deserves more attention to assess parameter sensitivity in social simulation models.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Business and International Management
Reference64 articles.
1. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books. ISBN: 0-465-02122-0
2. Axelrod R (1997) The complexity of cooperation: agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Complexity 3(3):46–48
3. Barabasi A (2016) Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Barabasi AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512
5. Barrett S, Dannenberg A (2012) Climate negotiations under scientific uncertainty. PNAS 109(43):17372–17376
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献