Author:
Stoll Andreas,Maier Andreas,Krauss Patrick,Gerum Richard,Schilling Achim
Abstract
AbstractRecently, the interest in spiking neural networks (SNNs) remarkably increased, as up to now some key advances of biological neural networks are still out of reach. Thus, the energy efficiency and the ability to dynamically react and adapt to input stimuli as observed in biological neurons is still difficult to achieve. One neuron model commonly used in SNNs is the leaky-integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron. LIF neurons already show interesting dynamics and can be run in two operation modes: coincidence detectors for low and integrators for high membrane decay times, respectively. However, the emergence of these modes in SNNs and the consequence on network performance and information processing ability is still elusive. In this study, we examine the effect of different decay times in SNNs trained with a surrogate-gradient-based approach. We propose two measures that allow to determine the operation mode of LIF neurons: the number of contributing input spikes and the effective integration interval. We show that coincidence detection is characterized by a low number of input spikes as well as short integration intervals, whereas integration behavior is related to many input spikes over long integration intervals. We find the two measures to linearly correlate via a correlation factor that depends on the decay time. Thus, the correlation factor as function of the decay time shows a powerlaw behavior, which could be an intrinsic property of LIF networks. We argue that our work could be a starting point to further explore the operation modes in SNNs to boost efficiency and biological plausibility.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
H2020 European Research Council
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference60 articles.
1. Abadi M et al (2015) TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. Software. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4724125
2. Alonso N, Millidge B, Krichmar J, et al. (2022) A theoretical framework for inference learning. In: Koyejo S, Mohamed S, Agarwal A, et al. (eds) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol 35. Curran Associates, Inc., pp 37335-37348. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/f242c4cba2467637256722cb679642bd-Paper-Conference.pdf
3. Apolinario MPE, Roy K (2023) S-tllr: Stdp-inspired temporal local learning rule for spiking neural networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.15220. Currently under review
4. Bender VA, Bender KJ, Brasier DJ et al (2006) Two coincidence detectors for spike timing-dependent plasticity in somatosensory cortex. J Neurosc 26(16):4166–4177. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0176-06.2006
5. Burkitt AN (2006) A review of the integrate-and-fire neuron model: I. Homogeneous synaptic input. Biol Cybern 95(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献