What do our research friends say about the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models? Introduction to the special issue

Author:

Gasselin PierreORCID,Hostiou NathalieORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models are an issue that is evincing much interest from the media and the political and professional fields. It is also an active area of research, a fact which led to a call for articles and the publication of a special issue. This article introduces and analyzes the 9 articles selected and published in 2020, and characterizes the diversity of the associated research (issues, fields, disciplines). After shedding light on the polysemy involved, as well as the fundamentals of the concept of agricultural and food model mobilized by the authors, we examine how they consider situations of coexistence. We identify three epistemological postures that reflect the contrasting positions of the authors vis-à-vis knowledge, actors, and action: functionalist coexistence, coexistence based on power relations, and coexistence in a transition perspective. These studies encourage the development of new research perspectives, in particular in order to make progress in the theorization of the coexistence and confrontation of agricultural and food models.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Albaladejo, C. (2001). Una Argentina discreta... La integración social y territorial de las innovaciones de las familias rurales en el partido de Saavedra. Revista Universitaria de Geografía, Argentina, 10(1&2), 131–148.

2. Albaladejo, C. (2020). The impossible and necessary coexistence of agricultural development models in the Pampas: the case of Santa Fe province (Argentina). Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, March, 2020, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00102-2.

3. Allaire, G., & Daviron, B. (2019). Ecology, capitalism and the new agricultural economy: the second great transformation. New York: Routledge.

4. Beus, C. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1990). Conventional versus alternative agriculture: the paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociology, 55(4), 590–616.

5. Bustos, H. (2013). Plaider pour la coexistence des modèles de production est politiquement très commode. Entretien avec Jean-Christophe Kroll. Transrural Initiatives, (430), 18–19.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3