Author:
Maes Dries,Vancauteren Mark,Van Passel Steven
Abstract
AbstractBelgian pork production has faced stagnating prices for decades. It remains unclear whether excessive market power from slaughterhouses or meat retailers has played a role in this trend. While market power studies can reveal some of the market dynamics in this setting, this type of research has not yet been applied to the Belgian pork market. The present paper investigates oligopolies and oligopsonies in the pork production sector. We build a new model that focuses on market power dynamics in the market for live pigs and distinguishes horizontal and vertical market power parameters, both for pig farmers and for slaughterhouses. The results follow from an empirical application using unique slaughterhouse data for 2001–2015. The results indicate that the farmers benefit from a significant power advantage in the live pig market, when very modest price demands are taken as a reference. The final market price of live pigs approaches the price requested by the farmers. On the other hand, the measured vertical market power also suggests that a pig farmer does not receive the (modest) full-wage-based salary. The market power of the slaughterhouses is also limited. Market power as a result of collusion—that is, horizontal market power—is present, but is not strong. However, there are significant differences between the slaughterhouses in terms of mark-up on the input prices. These differences reflect differences in company strategy, and this diversity further reduces the possibility to create sector-wide collusive behaviour.
Funder
H2020 Food
TUL Impuls (transnational university Limburg) Interuniversity fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference47 articles.
1. Amoroso, S., Kort P., Melenberg, B, Plasmans J and M. Vancauteren (2015), Productivity, price- and wage-markups: an empirical analysis of the Dutch manufacturing industry. Munich, CESifo Working Papers 5273.
2. Appelbaum, E. (1982). The estimation of the degree of oligopoly power. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 287–299.
3. Azzam, A. M. (1996). Estimating the degree of dominance in a bilateral oligopoly. Applied Economics Letters, 3(4), 209–211.
4. Azzam, A., & Pagoulatos, E. (1990). Testing oligopolistic and oligopsonistic behaviour: an application to the US meat-packing industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41(3), 362–370.
5. Azzam, A. M., & Schroeter, J. R. (1991). Implications of increased regional concentration and oligopsonistic coordination in the beef packing industry. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16(2), 374–381.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献