Investigating market power in the Belgian pork production chain

Author:

Maes Dries,Vancauteren Mark,Van Passel Steven

Abstract

AbstractBelgian pork production has faced stagnating prices for decades. It remains unclear whether excessive market power from slaughterhouses or meat retailers has played a role in this trend. While market power studies can reveal some of the market dynamics in this setting, this type of research has not yet been applied to the Belgian pork market. The present paper investigates oligopolies and oligopsonies in the pork production sector. We build a new model that focuses on market power dynamics in the market for live pigs and distinguishes horizontal and vertical market power parameters, both for pig farmers and for slaughterhouses. The results follow from an empirical application using unique slaughterhouse data for 2001–2015. The results indicate that the farmers benefit from a significant power advantage in the live pig market, when very modest price demands are taken as a reference. The final market price of live pigs approaches the price requested by the farmers. On the other hand, the measured vertical market power also suggests that a pig farmer does not receive the (modest) full-wage-based salary. The market power of the slaughterhouses is also limited. Market power as a result of collusion—that is, horizontal market power—is present, but is not strong. However, there are significant differences between the slaughterhouses in terms of mark-up on the input prices. These differences reflect differences in company strategy, and this diversity further reduces the possibility to create sector-wide collusive behaviour.

Funder

H2020 Food

TUL Impuls (transnational university Limburg) Interuniversity fund

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference47 articles.

1. Amoroso, S., Kort P., Melenberg, B, Plasmans J and M. Vancauteren (2015), Productivity, price- and wage-markups: an empirical analysis of the Dutch manufacturing industry. Munich, CESifo Working Papers 5273.

2. Appelbaum, E. (1982). The estimation of the degree of oligopoly power. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2–3), 287–299.

3. Azzam, A. M. (1996). Estimating the degree of dominance in a bilateral oligopoly. Applied Economics Letters, 3(4), 209–211.

4. Azzam, A., & Pagoulatos, E. (1990). Testing oligopolistic and oligopsonistic behaviour: an application to the US meat-packing industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 41(3), 362–370.

5. Azzam, A. M., & Schroeter, J. R. (1991). Implications of increased regional concentration and oligopsonistic coordination in the beef packing industry. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 16(2), 374–381.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Market power and sustainability: a new research agenda;Discover Sustainability;2022-02-08

2. Estimating the degree of market power in the vegetable market in Japan;Agricultural and Resource Economics Review;2021-08-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3