Abstract
AbstractTranscatheter heart valve replacements (TVR) are mostly designed in a closed position (c) with leaflets coaptating. However, recent literature suggests fabricating valves in semi-closed (sc) position to minimize pinwheeling. With about 100,000 children in need of a new pulmonary valve each year worldwide, this study evaluates both geometrical approaches in adult as well as pediatric size and condition. Three valves of each geometry were fabricated in adult (30 mm) and pediatric (15 mm) size, using porcine pericardium. To evaluate performance, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG), effective orifice area (EOA), and regurgitation fraction (RF) were determined in three different annulus geometries (circular, elliptic, and tilted). For both adult-sized valve geometries, the TPG (TPGC = 2.326 ± 0.115 mmHg; TPGSC = 1.848 ± 0.175 mmHg)* and EOA (EOAC = 3.69 ± 0.255 cm2; EOASC = 3.565 ± 0.025 cm2)* showed no significant difference. Yet the RF as well as its fluctuation was significantly higher for valves with the closed geometry (RFC = 12.657 ± 7.669 %; RFSC = 8.72 ± 0.977 %)*. Recordings showed that the increased backflow was caused by pinwheeling due to a surplus of tissue material. Hydrodynamic testing of pediatric TVRs verified the semi-closed geometry being favourable. Despite the RF (RFC = 7.721 ± 0.348 cm2; RFSC = 5.172 ± 0.679 cm2), these valves also showed an improved opening behaviour ((TPGC = 20.929 ± 0.497 cm2; TPGSC = 15.972 ± 1.158 cm2); (EOAC = 0.629 ± 0.017 cm2; EOASC = 0.731 ± 0.026 cm2)). Both adult and pediatric TVR with semi-closed geometry show better fluiddynamic functionality compared to valves with a closed design due to less pinwheeling. Besides improved short-term functionality, less pinwheeling potentially prevents early valve degeneration and improves durability. *Results are representatively shown for a circular annulus geometry.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Harken, D. E. Heart valves: ten commandments and still counting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(89)90623-1.
2. Hyde, J. A. J., J. A. Chinn, and R. E. Phillips. Polymer heart valves. J. Heart Valve Dis. 8(3):331–339, 1999. https://europepmc.org/article/med/10399670. Accessed 4 Oct 2022.
3. Kouhi, E., and Y. S. Morsi. A parametric study on mathematical formulation and geometrical construction of a stentless aortic heart valve. J. Artif. Organs. 16(4):425–442, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-013-0719-z.
4. Travaglino, S., et al. Computational optimization study of transcatheter aortic valve leaflet design using porcine and bovine leaflets. J. Biomech. Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4044244.
5. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5840-3:2021—Cardiovascular implants—cardiac valve prostheses—Part 3: heart valve substitutes implanted by transcatheter techniques, 2021. https://www.iso.org/standard/67606.html.