Abstract
AbstractAs full-scale detailed hemodynamic simulations of the entire vasculature are not feasible, numerical analysis should be focused on specific regions of the cardiovascular system, which requires the identification of lumped parameters to represent the patient behavior outside the simulated computational domain. We present a novel technique for estimating cardiovascular model parameters using gappy Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (g-POD). A POD basis is constructed with FSI simulations for different values of the lumped model parameters, and a linear operator is applied to retain information that can be compared to the available patient measurements. Then, the POD coefficients of the reconstructed solution are computed either by projecting patient measurements or by solving a minimization problem with constraints. The POD reconstruction is then used to estimate the model parameters. In the first test case, the parameter values of a 3-element Windkessel model are approximated using artificial patient measurements, obtaining a relative error of less than 4.2%. In the second case, 4 sets of 3-element Windkessel are approximated in a patient’s aorta geometry, resulting in an error of less than 8% for the flow and less than 5% for the pressure. The method shows accurate results even with noisy patient data. It automatically calculates the delay between measurements and simulations and has flexibility in the types of patient measurements that can handle (at specific points, spatial or time averaged). The method is easy to implement and can be used in simulations performed in general-purpose FSI software.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Ritchie, H., and M. Roser. Causes of death. Our World in Data. 2018. https://ourworldindata.org/causes-of-death. February 13, 2022.
2. Pantos, I., and D. Katritsis. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Interventional Cardiology Review. 2014. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2014.9.3.145.
3. van Bakel, T. M. J., K. D. Lau, J. Hirsch-Romano, S. Trimarchi, A. L. Dorfman, and C. A. Figueroa. Patient-specific modeling of hemodynamics: supporting surgical planning in a Fontan circulation correction. Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-017-9781-x.
4. Salleh, N. M., M. S. Zakaria, and M. J. Abd Latif. CFD simulation for reduction thrombosis in bileaflet mechanical heart valve using vortex generators. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. 16(3):2736–2747, 2021.
5. Campo-Deaño, L., M. S. N. Oliveira, and F. T. Pinho. A review of computational hemodynamics in middle cerebral aneurysms and rheological models for blood flow. Applied Mechanics Reviews. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028946.