Abstract
AbstractThis review explores Thomas Lessl’s “Demarcation as a classroom response to creationism: A critical examination of the National Academy of Science’s Science, Evolution, and Creationism (2008).” Lessl’s work examines philosophical debates about the relationship between science and religion from the perspective of communication dynamics between science teachers and audiences skeptical about evolution. His essay raises a number of important points that might help educators craft statements that are less likely to alienate religious students and to entrench any pre-existing opposition to evolutionary science. However, in this review, I raise a number of criticisms of Lessl’s account of the problems with the approach taken by the National Academy of Science. I argue that many of the criticisms of NAS’s approach to demarcation are not well-supported, and even were they to be strong criticisms, they do not justify skepticism toward evolution or science in general. Ultimately, I argue that addressing Lessl’s concerns means creating space for more intellectually rigorous and satisfying discussions of science and religion, but this is not appropriate in a biology classroom that merely wishes to introduce evolution. Addressing these concerns requires making more space for philosophy in the curriculum.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference5 articles.
1. Beilby, J. K. (2002). Naturalism defeated? Essays on Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism (Vol. 2). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
2. Coyne, J. A. (2009). Why evolution is true. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Coyne, J. A. (2015). Faith versus fact: Why science and religion are incompatible. New York: Viking.
4. Nagel, T. (2008). Public education and intelligent design. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/40212818
5. Pigliucci, M., & Müller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution: The extended synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献