A Combination of Machine Learning and PBPK Modeling Approach for Pharmacokinetics Prediction of Small Molecules in Humans
-
Published:2024-06-25
Issue:7
Volume:41
Page:1369-1379
-
ISSN:0724-8741
-
Container-title:Pharmaceutical Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Pharm Res
Author:
Li Yuelin, Wang Zonghu, Li Yuru, Du Jiewen, Gao Xiangrui, Li Yuanpeng, Lai LipengORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose:
Recently, there has been rapid development in model-informed drug development, which has the potential to reduce animal experiments and accelerate drug discovery. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and machine learning (ML) models are commonly used in early drug discovery to predict drug properties. However, basic PBPK models require a large number of molecule-specific inputs from in vitro experiments, which hinders the efficiency and accuracy of these models. To address this issue, this paper introduces a new computational platform that combines ML and PBPK models. The platform predicts molecule PK profiles with high accuracy and without the need for experimental data.
Methods:
This study developed a whole-body PBPK model and ML models of plasma protein fraction unbound ($$f_{up}$$
f
up
), Caco-2 cell permeability, and total plasma clearance to predict the PK of small molecules after intravenous administration. Pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated using a “bottom-up” PBPK modeling approach with ML inputs. Additionally, 40 compounds were used to evaluate the platform’s accuracy.
Results:
Results showed that the ML-PBPK model predicted the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) with 65.0$$\%$$
%
accuracy within a 2-fold range, which was higher than using in vitro inputs with 47.5$$\%$$
%
accuracy.
Conclusion:
The ML-PBPK model platform provides high accuracy in prediction and reduces the number of experiments and time required compared to traditional PBPK approaches. The platform successfully predicts human PK parameters without in vitro and in vivo experiments and can potentially guide early drug discovery and development.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Poggesi I, Snoeys J, Van Peer A. The successes and failures of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling: there is room for improvement. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2014;10(5):631–5. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2014.888058. Accessed 2023-06-12. 2. Tylutki Z, Polak S, Wiśniowska B. Top-down, Bottom-up and Middle-out Strategies for Drug Cardiac Safety Assessment via Modeling and Simulations. Current Pharmacology Reports. 2016;2(4):171–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40495-016-0060-3. Accessed 2023-06-13. 3. ...Ahmad A, Pepin X, Aarons L, Wang Y, Darwich AS, Wood JM, Tannergren C, Karlsson E, Patterson C, Thörn H, Ruston L, Mattinson A, Carlert S, Berg S, Murphy D, Engman H, Laru J, Barker R, Flanagan T, Abrahamsson B, Budhdeo S, Franek F, Moir A, Hanisch G, Pathak SM, Turner D, Jamei M, Brown J, Good D, Vaidhyanathan S, Jackson C, Nicolas O, Beilles S, Nguefack JF, Louit G, Henrion L, Ollier C, Boulu L, Xu C, Heimbach T, Ren X, Lin W, Nguyen-Trung AT, Zhang J, He H, Wu F, Bolger MB, Mullin JM, Van Osdol B, Szeto K, Korjamo T, Pappinen S, Tuunainen J, Zhu W, Xia B, Daublain P, Wong S, Varma MVS, Modi S, Schäfer KJ, Schmid K, Lloyd R, Patel A, Tistaert C, Bevernage J, Nguyen MA, Lindley D, Carr R, Rostami-Hodjegan A. IMI-Oral biopharmaceutics tools project-Evaluation of bottom-up PBPK prediction success part 4: Prediction accuracy and software comparisons with improved data and modelling strategies. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2020;156:50–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.08.006. Accessed 2023-06-12. 4. Naga D, Parrott N, Ecker GF, Olivares-Morales A. Evaluation of the Success of High-Throughput Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (HT-PBPK) Modeling Predictions to Inform Early Drug Discovery. Mol Pharm. 2022;19(7):2203–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00040. Accessed 2023-06-12. 5. Antontsev V, Jagarapu A, Bundey Y, Hou H, Khotimchenko M, Walsh J, Varshney J. A hybrid modeling approach for assessing mechanistic models of small molecule partitioning in vivo using a machine learning-integrated modeling platform. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90637-1. Accessed 2023-06-12.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|