Abstract
AbstractOur work considers the sociotechnical and organisational constraints of web archiving in order to understand how these factors and contingencies influence research engagement with national web collections. In this article, we compare and contrast our experiences of undertaking web archival research at two national web archives: the UK Web Archive located at the British Library and the Netarchive at the Royal Danish Library. Based on personal interactions with the collections, interviews with library staff and observations of web archiving activities, we invoke three conceptual devices (orientating, auditing and constructing) to describe common research practices and associated challenges in the context of each national web archive. Through this framework we centre the early stages of the research process that are often only given cursory attention in methodological descriptions of web archival research, to discuss the epistemological entanglements of researcher practices, instruments, tools and methods that create the conditions of possibility for new knowledge and scholarship in this space. In this analysis, we highlight the significant time and energy required on the part of researchers to begin using national web archives, as well as the value of engaging with the curatorial infrastructure that enables web archiving in practice. Focusing an analysis on these research infrastructures facilitates a discussion of how these web archival interfaces both enable and foreclose on particular forms of researcher engagement with the past Web and in turn contributes to critical ongoing debates surrounding the opportunities and constraints of digital sources, methodologies and claims within the Digital Humanities.
Funder
ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton
University of Southampton
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Canada Graduate Scholarships - Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplements
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Ackerman, M. S. (2000). The intellectual challenge of CSCW: The gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human–Computer Interaction, 15(2–3), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_5.
2. Ankerson, M. S. (2015). Read/write the digital archive: Strategies for historical web research. In E. Hargittai & C. Sandvig (Eds.), Digital research confidential: The secrets of studying behavior online (pp. 29–54). MIT Press.
3. Baker, J. (2013). A page, but not as we know it. British Library Digital scholarship blog. Blog. https://britishlibrary.typepad.co.uk/digital-scholarship/2013/06/a-page-but-not-as-we-know-it.html. Accessed 30 Oct 2018.
4. Ben-David, A. (2016). What does the web remember of its deleted past? An archival reconstruction of the former Yugoslav top-level domain. New Media & Society, 18(7), 1103–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816643790.
5. Ben-David, A., & Amram, A. (2018). The internet archive and the socio-technical construction of historical facts. Internet Histories, 2(1–2), 179–201.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献