Abstract
AbstractTraditional critical editions in print offer a model for creating a culture of reproducible and explainable research in Digital Humanities. In addition to explaining their editorial methods and practices in a preface, editors provide a critical apparatus to allow readers to evaluate the evidence and decide for themselves whether the editor’s judgment is sound. This paper will argue for viewing distributed, version-controlled data repositories (e.g., Git) in the same way, to empower users to follow the choices and methods of DH researchers and to reproduce their work. Using examples from a current project, this paper will propose some guidelines for using Git to promote reproducibility and explainability in the publication of DH research of all kinds.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference16 articles.
1. Broyles, P. A. (2022). Electronic versioning and digital editions. In M. Vareschi & H. Wacha (Eds.), Intermediate horizons (pp. 147–166). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh2cnh.12
2. Chacon, S., & Straub, B. (2014). Pro Git. Retrieved from https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
3. Edmond, J., & Lehmann, J. (2021). Digital humanities, knowledge complexity, and the five ‘aporias’ of digital research. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(Supplement_2), ii95–ii108. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab031
4. Giarratano, C. (Ed.). (1910). Calpurnii et nemesiani bucolica. Neapoli: Apud Detken et Rocholl.
5. Giarratano, C. (Ed.). (1924). Calpurnii et nemesiani bucolica. Aug Taurinorum: In aedibus I.B. Paraviae.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Reproducibility and explainability in digital humanities;International Journal of Digital Humanities;2024-01-03
2. Reproducibility and explainability in digital humanities;International Journal of Digital Humanities;2023-12-04