1. Barabucci, G., & Fischer, F. (2017). The formalization of textual criticism: Bridging the gap between automated collation and edited critical texts. In P. Boot, A. Cappellotto, W. Dillen, F. Fischer, A. Kelly, A. Mertgens, A.-M. Sichani, E. Spadini, & D. van Hulle (Eds.), Advances in digital scholarly editing: Papers presented at the Dixit conferences in the Hague, Cologne, and Antwerp (pp. 47–54). Leiden: Sidestone Press.
2. Barabucci, G., Spadini, E., & Turska, M. (2017). Data vs. presentation: What is the core of a scholarly digital edition? In P. Boot, A. Cappellotto, W. Dillen, F. Fischer, A. Kelly, A. Mertgens, A.-M. Sichani, E. Spadini, & D. van Hulle (Eds.), Advances in digital scholarly editing: Papers presented at the Dixit conferences in The Hague, Cologne, and Antwerp (pp. 37–46). Leiden: Sidestone Press.
3. Ciotti, F. (2017). Towards a new realism for digital textuality. In P. Boot, A. Cappellotto, W. Dillen, F. Fischer, A. Kelly, A. Mertgens, A.-M. Sichani, E. Spadini, & D. van Hulle (Eds.), Advances in digital scholarly editing: Papers presented at the Dixit conferences in the Hague, Cologne, and Antwerp (pp. 85–90). Leiden: Sidestone Press.
4. Cummings, J. (2008). The text encoding initiative and the study of literature. In S. Schreibman & R. Siemens (Eds.), A companion to digital literary studies (pp. 451–476). Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Cummings, J. (2014). The compromises and flexibility of TEI customisation. In C. Mills, M. Pidd, & E. Ward (Eds.), Proceedings of the Digital Humanities Congress 2012. Studies in the digital humanities. Sheffield: HRI Online Publications.
https://www.dhi.ac.uk/openbook/chapter/dhc2012-cummings
. Accessed 13 May 2019.