Influence of the Experimental Setup on the Damping Properties of SLM Lattice Structures

Abstract

Abstract Background Metal lattice structures obtained through Selective Laser Melting may increase the strength-to-weight ratio of advanced 3D printed parts, as well as their damping properties. Recent experimental results showed that AlSi10Mg and AISI 316L lattices are characterized by higher Rayleigh damping coefficients with respect to the fully dense material. However, some unclear or contradictory results were found, depending on the experimental setup adopted for modal analysis. Objective In this work the influence of the experimental setup when performing modal analysis on different SLM AISI 316L lattice structures was deeply investigated. The study provides a critical comparison of various experimental modal analysis approaches, allowing to evaluate the influence of external damping sources and material internal damping phenomena. Methods The dynamic behaviour of SLM AISI 316L specimens incorporating lattice structures was estimated by means of pulse testing and sinusoidal excitation through an electromagnetic shaker. The validity of the viscous damping model was assessed by means of sinusoidal excitation with different levels of vibration velocity. Moreover, the influence of experimental setup on modal analysis results was critically evaluated, by considering different actuators, contact and non-contact sensors and boundary/clamping conditions. Results The classical viscous damping model describes with good approximation the damping properties of SLM lattice structures. When exciting single specimens in free-free conditions, those embedding lattice structure and unmelted metal powder filler were characterized by superior internal damping properties with respect to the specimens incorporating the lattice structure without any filler, which was however more effective than the full density equivalent material. Most of the other experimental setups introduced additional external damping sources, that could alter this important outcome. Conclusions SLM lattice structures embedded into 3D printed components provide superior damping properties against mechanical and acoustic vibrations and the metal powder filler does significantly enhance such damping capacity. A correct estimation of material internal damping was achieved by applying non-contact sensors and free-free boundary conditions, whereas other experimental setups were partly inadequate.