Abstract
AbstractIn this paper we investigate the benefits of applying a multi-objective approach for solving a symbolic regression problem by means of Grammatical Evolution. In particular, we extend previous work, obtaining mathematical expressions to model glucose levels in the blood of diabetic patients. Here we use a multi-objective Grammatical Evolution approach based on the NSGA-II algorithm, considering the root-mean-square error and an ad-hoc fitness function as objectives. This ad-hoc function is based on the Clarke Error Grid analysis, which is useful for showing the potential danger of mispredictions in diabetic patients. In this work, we use two datasets to analyse two different scenarios: What-if and Agnostic, the most common in daily clinical practice. In the What-if scenario, where future events are evaluated, results show that the multi-objective approach improves previous results in terms of Clarke Error Grid analysis by reducing the number of dangerous mispredictions. In the Agnostic situation, with no available information about future events, results suggest that we can obtain good predictions with only information from the previous hour for both Grammatical Evolution and Multi-Objective Grammatical Evolution.
Funder
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Fundación Eugenio Rodríguez Pascual
Consejería de Educación, Juventud y Deporte, Comunidad de Madrid
Comunidad de Madrid
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Hardware and Architecture,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference54 articles.
1. E.M. Aiello, G. Lisanti, L. Magni, M. Musci, C. Toffanin, Therapy-driven deep glucose forecasting. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 87, 103255 (2020)
2. P.A. Bakhtiani, L.M. Zhao, J. El Youssef, J.R. Castle, W.K. Ward, A review of artificial pancreas technologies with an emphasis on bi-hormonal therapy. Diab. Obes. Metab. 15(12), 1065–1070 (2013)
3. Y. Bengio, Y. Grandvalet, No unbiased estimator of the variance of k-fold cross-validation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 1089–1105 (2004)
4. B. Calvo, J. Ceberio, J.A. Lozano, in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion. Bayesian inference for algorithm ranking analysis (GECCO’18, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2018), p. 324–325
5. B. Calvo, G. Santafé Rodrigo, scmamp: Statistical comparison of multiple algorithms in multiple problems. R J. 8/1 (2016)
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献