Author:
Wittenberg David,Rothlauf Franz,Gagné Christian
Abstract
AbstractDenoising autoencoder genetic programming (DAE-GP) is a novel neural network-based estimation of distribution genetic programming approach that uses denoising autoencoder long short-term memory networks as a probabilistic model to replace the standard mutation and recombination operators of genetic programming. At each generation, the idea is to capture promising properties of the parent population in a probabilistic model and to use corruption to transfer variations of these properties to the offspring. This work studies the influence of corruption and sampling steps on search. Corruption partially mutates candidate solutions that are used as input to the model, whereas the number of sampling steps defines how often we re-use the output during model sampling as input to the model. We study the generalization of the royal tree problem, the Airfoil problem, and the Pagie-1 problem, and find that both corruption strength and the number of sampling steps influence exploration and exploitation in search and affect performance: exploration increases with stronger corruption and lower number of sampling steps. The results indicate that both corruption and sampling steps are key to the success of the DAE-GP: it permits us to balance the exploration and exploitation behavior in search, resulting in an improved search quality. However, also selection is important for exploration and exploitation and should be chosen wisely.
Funder
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
Interdisciplinary Public Policy Mainz
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Hardware and Architecture,Theoretical Computer Science,Software
Reference46 articles.
1. K. Kim, Y. Shan, X.H. Nguyen, R.I. McKay, Probabilistic model building in genetic programming: a critical review. Genet. Program Evolvable Mach. 15(2), 115–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10710-013-9205-x
2. M. Pelikan, M.W. Hauschild, F.G. Lobo, Introduction to estimation of distribution algorithms. Missouri Estimation of Distribution Algorithms Laboratory (MEDAL), Report Nr. 2012003 (2012)
3. J.H. Holland, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1975)
4. D. Wittenberg, F. Rothlauf, D. Schweim, DAE-GP: Denoising autoencoder LSTM networks as probabilistic models in estimation of distribution genetic programming, in Proceedings of the 2020 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference. GECCO’20 (ACM, New York, 2020), pp. 1037–1045. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377930.3390180
5. P. Vincent, H. Larochelle, Y. Bengio, P.A. Manzagol, Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders, in Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML’08) (ACM, Helsinki, 2008), pp. 1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390156.1390294