Author:
Lombardi Jason V.,Yamashita Thomas J.,Blackburn AnnMarie,Young John H.,Tewes Michael E.,Anderson C. Jane
Abstract
Abstract
Assessment of locations where wildlife species cross highways is a key question in mitigating future wildlife-vehicle mortality. Examination of the spatial structure, complexities, and patterns of vegetation or other land-use types (i.e., cropland, urban areas) near roadways allows scientists to identify any thresholds that influence where animals are likely to die or successfully cross the roadway. We used a historic 1982 to 2017 dataset of ocelot (Leopardus pardalis pardalis) mortality locations and approximate road crossing locations of telemetered ocelots in the Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas to examine the spatial structure of woody vegetation within a hypothesized road effect zone. We determined if there were differences in the spatial structure of woody cover within a 1050 m buffer of each successful crossing and roadkill location using PERMANOVA and principal component analyses. We used a similarity percentages analysis to determine the relative contribution of each aspect of spatial structure on differences in successful crossing and roadkill locations. We found statistically significant differences in spatial attributes of patches at the locations of successful crossing versus roadkill locations of ocelots at the 150 m spatial extent (pseudo-F1,41 = 4.85, P(perm) = 0.008, permutations = 9949). Largest patch index contributed most to the differences between successful crossing and roadkill locations (15.94%), followed by mean patch area (15.44%), percent woody cover (15.18%), aggregation indices (14.53%), Euclidean nearest neighbor (13.47%), edge (13.08%) and patch densities (12.36%). Roadkill locations were clustered in locations with lower-quality woody cover within 300 m of the highway. This suggests areas immediately surrounding roads need to contain woody patches that are larger and closer together to reduce the barrier-effects of roads. Such information is important for informing highway planners about where to encourage crossings or to build wildlife crossing structures to promote movement across the highway.
Funder
Texas Department of Transportation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Aaron Economic Consulting (2017) South Padre Island Resort Market Analysis, Aaron Economic Consulting, LLC
2. Ament R, Clevenger AP, Yu O, Hardy A (2008) An assessment of road impacts on wildlife populations in US National Parks. Envir Manag 42:480–496
3. Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust Ecol 26:32–46
4. Andrasi B, Jaeger JAG, Heinicke S, Metcalfe K, Hockings KJ (2021) Quantifying the road-effect zone for a critically endangered primate. Conserv Let 14:e12839
5. Ascensão F, Kindel A, Teixeira FZ, Barrientos R, D’Amico M, Borda-de-Água L, Pereira HM (2019) Beware that he lack of wildlife mortality records can mask a serious impact of linear infrastructures. Glob Ecol Conserv 19:e00661
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献