Abstract
AbstractLoneliness is commonly conceived of as a topic under the purview of psychology. Empirical research on loneliness utilizes a definition of psychology as essentially subjective, i.e. as a first-personal mental property an individual can have. As a first-personal mental property, subjects have, as it were, privileged access to their state of being lonely. Rehearsing some well-known arguments from later Wittgenstein, I argue that loneliness – contrary to an unargued assumption present in several academic engagements – is not subjective in the sense that whether or not a person is lonely does not in all cases hinge on that person’s subjective mental states. This becomes apparent when considering cases of alienation from self-knowledge (Moran 2001). Using Heidegger’s notion of being-in-the-world and being-with I argue that such cases from alienation point towards the notion that loneliness is not merely a subjective feeling, but a categorically different privation of the fundamental mode of being with others.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference46 articles.
1. Augustine (2020) In: Rotelle JE et al (eds) Confessions, the Works of Saint Augustine. A translation for the 21st Century, vol 1. New City Press, New York
2. Aho K (2022) “‘We’re protecting them to death’ – a heideggerian interpretation of loneliness among older adults in long-term care facilities during COVID-19”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–14
3. Boyle M (2015) Critical study: Cassam on Self-Knowledge for humans. Eur J Philos 23(2):337–348
4. Cacioppo J, Patrick W (2008) Loneliness. Norton and Company, New York & London
5. Cassam Q (2014) Self-knowledge for humans. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献