Abstract
AbstractRelaxed naturalism and liberal naturalism both invite us to adopt a philosophy of nature that includes a range of non-scientific phenomena in its inventory while nevertheless keeping the supernatural at bay. This paper considers the question of how relaxed naturalism relates to liberal naturalism and what refinements are required if they are to succeed in their joint cause of developing a tenable alternative to scientific naturalism. Particular attention is given to what might be added to the naturalist’s toolbox when it comes to identifying and dealing with supernatural excesses and clarifying how philosophers can do positive metaphysical work in support of the naturalistic project.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference48 articles.
1. Churchland PM (1981) Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. J Philos 78(2):67–90
2. Clark S (2015) Witchcraft and Magic in Early Modern Culture. In: Parish H (ed) Superstition and Magic in Early Modern Europe: A Reader. Bloomsbury, London, pp 215–274
3. De Caro M (2022) Liberal Naturalism: Origins and Prospects. In The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. (pp.205–217). De Caro M, Macarthur D (eds). London: Routledge
4. De Caro M, Macarthur D (2022) Introduction. In The Routledge Handbook of Liberal Naturalism. (pp.1–4). De Caro M, Macarthur D (eds). London: Routledge
5. De Caro M, Voltolini A (2010) Is Liberal Naturalism Possible? In Naturalism and Normativity. De Caro M, Macarthur D (eds). New York: Columbia University Press
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献