Abstract
AbstractIn recent times, particularly in the last few years, we have observed the rise of numerous Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing semantic technologies. These advancements have subtly yet profoundly transformed our understanding of knowledge and truth, and the mechanisms for expressing, preserving, and disseminating them. This article aims to explore the dual challenge of assessing the effects of Large Language Models and associated semantic technologies on text dissemination and production, especially across the Internet. It specifically examines the implications for trust in online knowledge repositories, the creation of indirect or deliberate forms of ignorance, and the general perception of AI as a critical component of autonomous systems from the users’ viewpoint. The discussion will also consider potential strategies to mitigate the epistemic risks posed by the employment of AI semantic tools, in both suitable and unsuitable scenarios. The suggested approach contributes to the debate on AI intelligence measurement, proposing the evaluation of an AI system’s expected intelligence (as perceived by users) as a means to address the challenges associated with the “knowledge” generated by these systems. My claim is that measuring the expected intelligence in AI systems places humans at the forefront of the issue without necessitating a precise definition of intelligence for AI systems. This approach preserves therefore the essential attribute of these systems: intelligence.
Funder
Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Anderson JR (1983) The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass
2. Bahdanau D, Cho K, Bengio Y (2014) Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. CoRR, abs/1409.0473 https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0473
3. Bender EM, Gebru T, McMillan-Major A, Shmitchell S (2021) On the dangers of stochastic parrots: can language models be Too big? In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, pp. 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
4. Bringsjord S (2011) Psychometric artificial intelligence. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 23:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813X.2010.502314
5. Brown T et al (2020) Language models are few shots learners. Adv Neural Inform Process Syst 33:1877–1901