Abstract
AbstractIs there good reason to worry about celebrity involvement in democratic politics? The rise of celebrity politicians such as Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky has led political theorists and commentators to worry that the role of expertise in democratic politics has been undermined. According to one recent critique (Archer et al. 2020), celebrities possess a significant degree of epistemic power (the power to influence what people believe) that is unconnected to appropriate expertise. This presents a problem both for deliberative and epistemic theories of democratic legitimacy, which ignore this form of power, and for real existing democracies attempting to meet the standards of legitimacy set out by these theories. But do these critiques apply to democratic elitism? In this paper, we argue that recognition of celebrity epistemic power in fact represents a valuable resource for supporting the legitimacy and practice of democratic elitism, though these benefits do come with certain risks to which elite theories are particularly vulnerable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference41 articles.
1. Alberoni, Francesco (1962) The powerless elite: theory and sociological research on the phenomenology of the stars. (Trans: Denis McQuail in McQuail (ed.)) Sociology of mass communication, Harmonsworth, Penguin. pp.75–98.
2. Archer A, Cawston A, Matheson B, Geuskens M (2020) Celebrity, democracy, and epistemic power. Perspect Polit 18(1):27–42
3. Bachrach P (1967) The theory of democratic elitism: a critique. Little, Brown and Company, Boston
4. Becker Amy B (2010). “Fresh politics: comedy, celebrity, and the promise of new political outlooks.” PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
5. Best H, Higley J (2010) Introduction: democratic elitism reappraised. In: Best H, Higley J (eds) Democratic elitism: new theoretical and comparative perspectives. Brill, Leiden, pp 1–22
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献