Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference17 articles.
1. Li Z, Yang M, Liao T, Zhou Y, Yue H, Piao Z, Zhou L (2020) Combined inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia and local infiltration anaesthesia in extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2002-z.
2. Kim C, Hwang KG, Park CJ (2018) Local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 18(5):287–294. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2018.18.5.287
3. Im TY, Hwang KG, Park CJ, Kim KS, Oh Y, Han JY, Shim KS (2010) Randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical trial on the efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia. J Korean Dent Soc Anesthesiol 10(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.17245/jkdsa.2010.10.1.1.
4. Sierra Rebolledo A, Delgado Molina E, BeriniAytés L, Gay EC (2007) Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 12(2):139–144 (PMID: 17322803)
5. Balakrishnan K, Ebenezer V, Dakir A, Kumar S, Prakash D (2015) Bupivacaine versus lignocaine as the choice of locallanesthetic agent for impacted third molar surgery a review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 7:S230. https://doi.org/10.4103/975-7406.155921.