Author:
Dinçer Cüneyt,Üstünel Selinay,Erkoç Hatice Nur,Yiyen Aysu,Aykın-Dinçer Elif
Abstract
AbstractThis study was aimed to determine the effects of various fruit juices used as impregnation solutions on the physicochemical, textural and sensory properties of dried chicken meat cubes. The pH, color parameters, total phenolic, antioxidant activity, water holding capacity, textural (TPA) and sensorial properties of the cubes were tested. Impregnation solutions used in the treatment groups were prepared with pomegranate, black grape and black mulberry juices, and salt solution (control). Impregnation was performed in two replicates and two samples were analyzed per replicate. The cubes were immersed in the solutions and the 10 min vacuum (250 mbar absolute pressure) − 10 min atmospheric pressure cycle was repeated at 4 °C for 2 h. pH values decreased (P < 0.01) by impregnation with various anthocyanin-rich fruit juices. Total phenolic and antioxidant activity were the highest (P < 0.01) in samples impregnated with pomegranate juice and were 720.71 mg GAE/kg and 840.22 mg TE/kg, respectively. The use of anthocyanin-rich fruit juices as impregnation solution decreased a* and b* values of samples (P < 0.01; P < 0.05, respectively). The TPA results indicated that impregnation with pomegranate, black grape and black mulberry juices induced lower (P < 0.01) hardness and higher (P < 0.05) adhesiveness values compared to the control. Consequently, the impregnation with anthocyanin-rich fruit juices such as pomegranate, black grape and black mulberry has the potential to improve the quality properties of dried chicken cubes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Food and Agricultute Organization of The United Nations, http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FS (2022)
2. Y.S. Choi, D.J. Han, J.H. Choi, K.E. Hwang, D.H. Song, H.W. Kim, Y.B. Kim, C.J. Kim, Poult. Sci. 95, 1198 (2016)
3. A. Castañeda-Ovando, M. De Lourdes, M.E. Pacheco-Hernández, J.A. Páez-Hernández, Rodríguez, and C.A.Galán-Vidal, Food Chem. 113, 859 (2009)
4. C. Dinçer, I. Tontul, A. Topuz, Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 38, 57 (2016)
5. S. Akyüz, O. Güneşer, B.N. Esen, J. Adv. Res. Nat. Appl. Sci. 6, 190 (2020)