Optimising Healthcare Communication for People with Aphasia in Hospital: Key Directions for Future Research

Author:

Lamborn EdwinaORCID,Carragher MarcellaORCID,O’Halloran RobynORCID,Rose Miranda L.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review People with aphasia and their healthcare workers have difficulty communicating, leaving people with aphasia at risk of poorer quality care, experiences and health outcomes. It is not yet known how best to optimise healthcare communication for this population. This literature review provides directions for future research regarding interventions aiming to optimise communication between healthcare workers and people with aphasia in hospital. Findings This paper offers four key foci to consider when planning or evaluating interventions: (1) individual and (2) systems-level environmental factors must be targeted to facilitate successful implementation, (3) reliable and feasible outcome measures must be developed to measure communication change in actual clinical interactions and (4) studies must be designed and reported adequately to ensure replicable and comparable research. Summary This paper provides direction for research on interventions to enhance patient-provider communication, and quality care for people with aphasia in hospital, to enable better participation and care outcomes for this population.

Funder

La Trobe University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference77 articles.

1. Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x.

2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Patient-centred care: improving quality and safety through partnerships with patients and consumers [Internet]. Sydney, Australia: ACSQHC; 2011. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/PCC_Paper_August.pdf.

3. National Health Service. Creating a patient­led NHS – delivering the NHS improvement plan. London, England: Department of Health; 2005.

4. US Department of Health and Human Services. Personalized health care: pioneers, partnerships, progress. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2008.

5. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian charter of healthcare rights, 2nd edn. Sydney, Australia: ACSQHC; 2020. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/charter_healthcare_rights_poster_a4_landscape_-_cmyk_print_-_may_2020.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3