Abstract
AbstractThis study takes a novel perspective on mobility as career script compliance to explore the factors that might influence how mobile academics in a country perceive the impact of international mobility on their overall academic career progression and job options. We conduct a country-level qualitative comparative analysis on a sample of 24 European Union (EU) countries, based on data from European Commission’s MORE3 indicator tool. We find that these perceptions about the impact are shaped by the dominant patterns of mobility in that country, and the general perception of academics in that particular country that international mobility is rewarded in the institutional promotion schemes. This study introduces new explanatory factors for the career script for international mobility. In so doing, we provide a richer understanding of how countries might influence academics’ mobility, which sheds light on previous inconclusive empirical evidence linking international mobility and academics’ careers. Our findings have implications for the policy design of international mobility and open up new lines of inquiry for cross-country comparisons.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference78 articles.
1. Ackers, L. (2005). Promoting scientific mobility and balanced growth in the European research area. Innovation, 18(3), 301–317.
2. Ackers, L. (2008). Internationalisation, mobility and metrics: A new form of indirect discrimination? Minerva, 46(4), 411–435.
3. Aksnes, D. W., Rørstad, K., Piro, F. N., & Sivertsen, G. (2013). Are mobile researchers more productive and cited than non-mobile researchers? A large-scale study of norwegian scientists. Research Evaluation, 22(4), 215–223.
4. Amara, N., Rhaiem, M., & Halilem, N. (2020). Assessing the research efficiency of Canadian scholars in the management field: Evidence from the DEA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 115, 296–306.
5. Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献