Abstract
AbstractHumanitarian events are increasing globally, both in number and intensity. In response, the international community spends approximately US$30 billion annually to alleviate both the immediate consequences of these climatic, geographic, and human-induced events but also to support mitigation and recovery. Over the past two decades, the humanitarian sector has increasingly professionalised. One under-studied aspect of this professionalisation is an increase in postgraduate studies in humanitarian action over the last 20 years. Despite this increase, there is no agreement on core curriculum or pedagogy across humanitarian studies courses. How do current Masters of Humanitarian Assistance (MHA) offerings converge and differ, and how can such courses further their contribution to the humanitarian endeavour? This paper surveys 26 anglophone courses offered in the United States, Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, and Nigeria, exploring key characteristics of course entry requirements, flexibility, research, practical components, and academic foci. It does not recommend what a core curriculum for humanitarian courses should be, but does argue that core curriculum for humanitarian courses should be identified by relevant and diverse stakeholders such as affected communities, humanitarian agencies, disaster management bodies, and governments, to ensure that courses in this field provide appropriate learning outcomes. The paper suggests how such a ‘charter’ may be developed.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP). (2010). The state of the humanitarian system. ALNAP/Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
2. Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP). (2018). The state of the humanitarian system. ALNAP/Overseas Development Institute (ODI).
3. Aardema, B. L., & Churruca Muguruza, C. (2014). The humanitarian action qualifications framework: A quality assurance tool for the humanitarian sector. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 1(2), 429–462.
4. Archer, F., & Seynaeve, G. (2007). International guidelines and standards for education and training to reduce the consequences of events that may threaten the health status of a community–A report of an open international WADEM meeting, Brussels, Belgium, 29-31 October 2004. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 22(2), 120–130.
5. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methods, 8(1), 19–32.