Employers’ conceptions of quality and value in higher education

Author:

Bettinson EmmaORCID,Young KellyORCID,Haven-Tang ClaireORCID,Cavanagh JillianORCID,Fisher RonORCID,Francis MarkORCID

Abstract

Abstract In this qualitative study, we research what constitutes the relationships between conceptions of quality and value associated with higher education as experienced by prospective employers of business graduates. Quality and value in higher education are often linked though the relationship is unclear. Employers are an important and under-researched stakeholder group on the demand side of higher education. Data are generated by interviewing prospective employers of business graduates from a UK university. Interviews are analysed using a phenomenographic method to determine the qualitatively different ways in which actors make sense of the relationships between quality and value. Understanding prospective employers’ conceptions of the relationships is important given the competitive pressures on universities and businesses. The research reinforces the experiential and idiosyncratic relationships between quality and value in higher education. Three conceptions of what constitutes quality and value in higher education are discussed: (a) quality is an antecedent of value; (b) quality is simple while value is complex; and (c) quality is internal to HE while value is created in the customer domain. The research outcomes provide important insights for researchers and practitioners through clearer understanding of how quality and value are related for this important stakeholder group.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference73 articles.

1. AACSB. (2020). Association to advance collegiate schools of business. Retrieved from https://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/business

2. Åkerlind, G. (2005). Learning about phenomenography: Interviewing, data analysis and the qualitative research paradigm. In J. Bowden & P. Green (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography. RMIT University Press.

3. Ansari, A., Modarress, B., & Ansari, A. (2022). Order winners criteria: A new approach in supplier selection. International Management Review, 18(1), 67–75.

4. Anttila, J., & Jussila, K. (2017). Understanding quality: Conceptualization of the fundamental concepts of quality. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 9(3/4), 251–268.

5. ARWU. (2019). Academic Ranking of World Universities. Retrieved from http://www.shanghairanking.com/Academic-Ranking-of-World-Universities-2019-Press-Release.html

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3