Abstract
AbstractNowadays, university rankings are a familiar phenomenon in higher education all over the world. But how did rankings achieve this status? To address this question, we bring in a historical-sociological perspective and conceptualize rankings as a phenomenon in history. We focus on the United States and identify the emergence of a specific understanding of organizational performance in the postwar decades. We argue that the advent of this understanding constituted a discursive shift, which was made possible—most notably but not solely—by the rise of functionalism to the status of a dominant intellectual paradigm. The shift crystallized in the rankings of graduate departments, which were commissioned by the National Science Foundation and produced by the American Council on Education (ACE) in 1966 and 1970. Throughout the 1970s, social scientists became increasingly more interested in the methods and merits of ranking higher education institutions, in which they would explicitly refer to the ACE rankings. This was accompanied by a growing recognition, already in the 1970s, that rankings had a place and purpose in the higher education system—a trend that has continued into the present day.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference79 articles.
1. Abend, G. (2020). Making things possible. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120926204
2. Astin, A. W. (2003). From number crunching to spirituality. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
3. Babcock, K. C. (1911). A classification of universities and colleges with reference to bachelor’s degrees. Washington, DC: Bureau of Education.
4. Berelson, B. (1960). Graduate education in the United States. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
5. Brankovic, J. (2018). The status games they play: Unpacking the dynamics of organisational status competition in higher education. Higher Education, 75(4), 695–709.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献