Abstract
AbstractDue to global attention on student employability, employers are expected to be involved in institutional governance in higher education and quality assurance (QA). Due to the difficulties in recruiting motivated employers to participate in external QA governance and process, this has become a challenging issue in many Asian nations. The paper aims to explore employer legitimacy in Asian national higher education regulations and EQA system according to a four-dimensional diagram of institutional governance model. There are two major findings. First, Asian governments developed QA policies with a focus on employer engagement but the emerging practice is still ineffective. Second, approaches of employer engagement in QA governance vary context to context, such as HK and Malaysia in the excellence mode; Taiwan, Indonesia, Australia, New Zealand belong to advanced type; and China, Thailand, and Vietnam fall in the intermediate category.
Funder
ministry of science and technology, taiwan
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference68 articles.
1. Association of Specialized and Professional Accreditors (ASPS). (2017). Outcomes- getting to the core of programmatic education and accreditation. D. C., ASPS.
2. Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA). (2015). Users’ guide to the standards for RTOs 2015. ASQA: Melbourne.
3. Autor, D. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent.” Science, 344(6186), 843–850.
4. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NViv. Sage.
5. Bloxham, S., Hudson, J., den Outer, B., & Price, M. (2015). External peer review of assessment: An effective approach to verifying standards? Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1069–1082.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献