Negotiating access and belonging in a higher education institution: a postqualitative narrative

Author:

Whitburn BenORCID,Riffo-Salgado PriscilaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to foreground accessibility as a necessary aspect of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI). We go about this by highlighting shared experiences of negotiating institutional ableism together, as a disabled scholar employed at a HEI in the UK, and a non-disabled, culturally and linguistically diverse individual employed to bridge inaccessible spaces. Drawing upon Wong’s (2023) conceptual framework of spatial belonging in higher education, which traverses the intersecting terrain of physical, digital, relational and structural spaces, we develop a postqualitative narrative demonstrating the limitations of narrowly defined legal protections that fall short of implementing inclusive ideals. The narrative draws attention to the ways that ‘access intimacy’, understood as shared commitments to accessibility, develops informally, which excuses HEIs from taking responsibility to institutionalise it. We contemplate accessibility as a relational concern and build an argument for learning from our experiences to inform the development of key accessibility considerations into institutional ways of working and relating to difference. The paper is significant for engaging principles from critical disability studies as conceptual means by which to consider accessibility, and the relational account provided contributes a collaborative perspective frequently experienced but not widely considered in higher education research for strengthening EDI.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference42 articles.

1. Advance HE. (2023). Advance HE’s Global Impact. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/consultancy-and-enhancement/global-impact-1. Accessed 05/03/2024.

2. Arndt, S., & Tesař, M. (2019). Reconfiguring Narrative Methodologies: Thresholds of realities in post-qualitative methodologies. In Springer eBooks (pp. 133–145). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6114-2_9

3. Barton, L. (2005). Emancipatory research and disabled people: Some observations and questions. Educational Review, 57(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500149325

4. Bhopal, K. (2022). ‘We can talk the talk, but we’re not allowed to walk the walk’: The role of equality and diversity staff in higher education institutions in England. Higher Education, 85(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00835-7

5. Blake, S., Capper, G., & Jackson, A. (2022). Building belonging in higher education: Recommendations for developing an Integrated Institutional approach. Pearson-Whonke. Retrieved February 28, 2024, from https://wonkhe.com/wp-content/wonkhe-uploads/2022/10/Building-Belonging-October-2022.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3