Organisational forms of science communication: the UK and Spanish European higher education systems as paradigms

Author:

Ojeda-Romano Gabriela,Fernández-Marcial Viviana,Wilkinson Clare,Stengler A. Erik

Abstract

AbstractAs key elements in research and development systems, higher education institutions have been taking a leading role when it comes to communicating science and technology, but their performance has been inconsistent so far. In this critical and comparative study of the UK public engagement model and the Spanish scientific culture model, eighteen practitioners from higher education institutions across both regions were interviewed. A mixed qualitative data analysis has been performed identifying similarities and differences that unravelled the science communication management model in the two different higher education systems. This article provides evidence on how the institutionalisation of science communication is strongly influenced by key driving forces in the higher education context as well as the policies of administrations and other agents.

Funder

Universidade da Coruña (UDC) and INDITEX SA

Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education

Reference55 articles.

1. Beere, A. C., Votruba, J. C., & Wells, G. W. (2011). Becoming an engaged campus: A practical guide for institutionalizing public engagement. Jossey-Bass. ISBN: 978–0–470–53226–3.

2. Besley, J. C. (2020). Five thoughts about improving science communication as an organizational activity. Journal of Communication Management, 24(3), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-03-2020-0022

3. Blanton, J. (2007). Engagement as a brand position in the higher education marketplace. International Journal of Educational Advancement, 7, 143–154.

4. Bodmer, W. F. (1985). The public understanding of science. Report of a Royal Society ad hoc Group endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. Royal Society. Retrieved April 9, 2019, from http://royalsociety.org/uploadedFiles/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. ISSN:1478-0887.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3