Abstract
AbstractAge simulation suits (ASS) are widely used to simulate sensory and physical restrictions that typically occur as people age. This review has two objectives: first, we synthesize the current research on ASS in terms of the observed psychological and physical effects associated with ASS. Second, we analyze indicators able to estimate the validity of ASS in simulating “true” ageing processes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, eight electronic databases were searched (BASE, Cinhal, Cochrane, Google Scholar, ProQuest, PsychINFO, Pubmed, and Web of Science). Qualitative and quantitative studies addressing effects of ASS interventions regarding psychological outcomes (i.e., empathy, attitudes) or physical parameters (i.e., gait, balance) were included. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was applied for quality assessment. Of 1890 identified citations, we included 94 for full-text screening and finally 26 studies were examined. Publication years ranged from 2001 to 2021. Study populations were predominantly based on students in health-related disciplines. Results suggest that ASS can initiate positive effects on attitudes toward (dweighted = 0.33) and empathy for older adults (dweighted = 0.54). Physical performance was significantly reduced; however, there is only little evidence of a realistic simulation of typical ageing processes. Although positive effects of ASS are supported to some extent, more diverse study populations and high-quality controlled designs are needed. Further, validation studies examining whether the simulation indeed reflects “real” ageing are needed and should build on reference data generated by standardized geriatric assessments or adequate comparison groups of older adults.Prospero registration: 232686.
Funder
Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health (social science)
Reference50 articles.
1. Agnew J, Bolla-Wilson K, Kawas C, Bleecker M (1988) Purdue pegboard age and sex norms for people 40 years old and older. Dev Neuropsychol 4(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565648809540388
2. Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Hoffman HJ, Sklare DA, Schubert MC (2011) The modified romberg balance test. Otol Neurotol 32(8):1309–1311. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822e5bee
3. Akpinar Söylemez B, Kücükgüclü Ö, Akyol MA, Tekin N, Isik AT (2021) Effects of the simulation based training program on attitudes of nurses towards older adults: a quasi-experimental design study. J Basic Clin Health Sci 5(3):186–194. https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.974288
4. Allen K (2018) The effect of an aging suit on young and middle-aged adults’ attitudes toward older adults [Bachelor Thesis, University inf Arkansas, Fayetteville]. COinS. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/hhpruht/61
5. Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM (2013) Risk factors for falls among older adults: a review of the literature. Maturitas 75(1):51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献